Activate Now kera bear telegram world-class on-demand viewing. Without subscription fees on our media destination. Submerge yourself in a endless array of themed playlists displayed in best resolution, optimal for prime viewing junkies. With content updated daily, you’ll always be in the know. Find kera bear telegram specially selected streaming in incredible detail for a deeply engaging spectacle. Access our content collection today to take in private first-class media with completely free, no strings attached. Be happy with constant refreshments and browse a massive selection of distinctive producer content made for top-tier media admirers. You have to watch hard-to-find content—instant download available! Witness the ultimate kera bear telegram specialized creator content with lifelike detail and select recommendations.

You'll need to complete a few actions and gain 15 reputation points before being able to upvote To gain full voting privileges, Upvoting indicates when questions and answers are useful

What's reputation and how do i get it We actually got this example from the book, where it used projection on w to prove that dimensions of w + w perp are equal to n, but i don't think it mentioned orthogonal projection, though i could be wrong (maybe we are just assumed not to do any other projections at our level, or maybe it was assumed it was a perpendicular projection, which i guess is the same thing). Instead, you can save this post to reference later.

Proof of kera = imb implies ima^t = kerb^t ask question asked 6 years ago modified 6 years ago

Thank you arturo (and everyone else) I managed to work out this solution after completing the assigned readings actually, it makes sense and was pretty obvious Could you please comment on also, while i know that ker (a)=ker (rref (a)) for any matrix a, i am not sure if i can say that ker (rref (a) * rref (b))=ker (ab) Is this statement true? just out of my curiosity?

OPEN